Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
  Journal of the Geological Society   Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of the Geological Society; April 1983; v. 140; no. 2; p. 203-213; DOI: 10.1144/gsjgs.140.2.0203
© 1983 Geological Society of London
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Darbyshire, D. P. F.
Right arrow Articles by Roobol, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Article

Rb-Sr isotope study of latest Proterozoic volcano-sedimentary belts in the Central Arabian Shield

D. P. F. Darbyshire, N. J. Jackson, C. R. Ramsay and M. J. Roobol

Five new Rb-Sr whole-rock isochrons for volcanic successions assigned to 'sequence' A in the Central Arabian Shield indicate that very late Precambrian c.690–570 Ma volcanicity was an important event in the evolution of the shield. The following ages are considered to define or approximate to the age of lava extrusion: Fatimah group— 688 ± 30 Ma; Jahhad unit—616 ± 13 Ma; Juqjuq formation— 612 ± 22 Ma; Arfan formation— 608 ± 9 Ma; Hummah unit— 572 ± 23 Ma. Initial 87Sr/86Sr ratios range from 0.7027 to 0.7036, and Rb/Sr ratios are uniformly low (<0.4), except for a few metarhyolites. All the lavas appear to have been derived from a primitive mantle-type source, although a slight increase of initial 87Srl86Sr ratio for the Jahhad and Hummah samples reflects the involvement of less-depleted mantle or possibly slight crustal contamination.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
P. R. Johnson and B. Woldehaimanot
Development of the Arabian-Nubian Shield: perspectives on accretion and deformation in the northern East African Orogen and the assembly of Gondwana
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2003; 206(1): 289 - 325.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
Y. Dilek and Z. Ahmed
Proterozoic ophiolites of the Arabian Shield and their significance in Precambrian tectonics
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2003; 218(1): 685 - 700.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the Geological SocietyHome page
S. M. BERHE
Ophiolites in Northeast and East Africa: implications for Proterozoic crustal growth
Journal of the Geological Society, February 1, 1990; 147(1): 41 - 57.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the Geological SocietyHome page
J. S. Stacey, D. B. Stoeser, W. R. Greenwood, and L. B. Fischer
U-Pb zircon geochronology and geological evolution of the Halaban-Al Amar region of the Eastern Arabian Shield, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Journal of the Geological Society, November 1, 1984; 141(6): 1043 - 1055.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the Geological SocietyHome page
M. J. Roobol, C. R. Ramsay, N. J. Jackson, and D. P. F. Darbyshire
Late Proterozoic lavas of the Central Arabian Shield--evolution of an ancient volcanic arc system
Journal of the Geological Society, April 1, 1983; 140(2): 185 - 202.
[Abstract] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of London