Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
  Journal of the Geological Society   Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of the Geological Society; April 1983; v. 140; no. 2; p. 311-313; DOI: 10.1144/gsjgs.140.2.0311
© 1983 Geological Society of London
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Article

Discussion on convection and crystallization in the Criffell–Dalbeattie pluton

DR. M. T. HOLDER writes: Phillips et al. (1981), describing the Criffell pluton, suggest that there are 2 foliation planes present within the granodiorite, arranged broadly parallel to the pluton contact and formed by 2 separate processes: a flow foliation defined by aligned xenoliths and a later deformation foliation formed during the uprise of the pluton. Recent studies of foliated granites (Ramsay 1981; Holder 1981; Brun & Pons 1981) suggest that the features described by Phillips et al. (1981) could alternatively be interpreted as being the products of pluton ballooning (Ramsay 1981; Holder 1979).

The arrangement of disc-shaped xenoliths lying sub-parallel to the deformation foliation (Phillips 1956) is consistent with the alignment of xenoliths by flattening caused by pluton ballooning (Ramsay 1981; Holder 1979). The lack of a measurable schistosity at the margin of the pluton, where xenoliths show little shape modification, together with the increasingly disc-like shape of xenoliths away from the pluton contacts as the deformation foliation intensifies, is cited by Phillips et al. (1981) as evidence precluding ballooning. This situation is similar to that illustrated by strain patterns recorded by deformed xenoliths in the Ardara pluton in Donegal, where intrusion by ballooning is unchallenged (Akaad 1956; Holder 1979, 1981). Strains at the margins of a ballooning pluton need not be high if early stages of ballooning have taken place before consolidation of the magma commenced (Holder 1981), while increases in the intensity of deformation away from the contact of such pluton a are not unknown (Holder 1981).

...

This 250-word extract was created in the absence of an abstract.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Can MineralHome page
D. S. Barker
ENDOGENOUS AND EXOGENOUS PLUTONS: THE INFLUENCE OF EMPLACEMENT STYLE ON CONTAMINATION OF GRANITIC MAGMA
Can Mineral, February 1, 2007; 45(1): 63 - 70.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of London