Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
  Journal of the Geological Society   Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of the Geological Society; January 1984; v. 141; no. 1; p. 191-192; DOI: 10.1144/gsjgs.141.1.0191
© 1984 Geological Society of London
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Article

Discussion of an interpretation of the Variscan Structures of SW England

Mr J. W. F. EDWARDS writes: I wish to present geophysical evidence which supports the thesis of Shackleton et al. that the Variscan granites of the Cornubian Peninsula originated to the SSE of their present positions, and were injected to the NNW as a sheet, from which diapirs rose to form batholiths. Thrust nappes in the basement of the English Channel Basin and the South-western Approaches Basin (Day & Edwards, in press) provide the anisotropy necessary for non-vertical intrusion. The model presented in fig. 7 of Shackleton et al. proposes two parallel batholiths with the NNW batholith being asymmetric, but the evidence for two batholiths rather than one is not given. The gravity evidence suggests that there is only one batholith under the Cornubian Peninsula, but that offshore under the Cornubian Platform there are two batholiths (Haig Fras and Cornubian) which are separate (Edwards, in press; Smith et al. 1965). A model in which the two batholiths are joined by a deep, gently inclined wedge of granite could be made to be consistent with the gravity data by changing the regional field. Two models of the Haig Fras batholith have been prepared to find whether a batholith with an asymmetric cross-section is consistent with the gravity values. The line of the models runs through the centre of the area of outcrop of granite as mapped by Fletcher (unpublished), and this map has been used to fix the edge of the batholith on the seabed in the models. As shown in

...

This 250-word extract was created in the absence of an abstract.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of the Geological SocietyHome page
R. A. CHADWICK, T. C. PHARAOH, and N. J. P. SMITH
Lower crustal heterogeneity beneath Britain from deep seismic reflection data
Journal of the Geological Society, August 1, 1989; 146(4): 617 - 630.
[Abstract] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of London