Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

Journal of the Geological Society

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Jones, M. E. Articles by Clayton, C. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

On natural deformation mechanisms in the Chalk

Chalk exhibits mechanical properties ranging from those akin to a stiff soil to those akin to a strong rock, depending on its diagenetic and deformation history. Two processes are identified which lead to this hardening of chalks: consolidation, which leads to a reduction in porosity to about 40%; and pressure solution/cementation which will occur only after consolidation has increased the effective stress. Both of these processes are restricted by low permeabilities so that during hardening it is necessary for the deformation to maintain permeable pathways to dissipate any excess pore fluid pressure. This is facilitated by fracturing or by the development of open stylolites which permit fluid flow. In the Isle of Purbeck (Dorset) a lateral gradient in chalk hardness across the Purbeck Axis reflects the increasing deformation of the chalk. Both consolidation and pressure solution/cementation have occurred, with complete cementation being restricted to the most highly strained chalk which is also the most fractured. The Purbeck Chalk provides a model for both diagenetic and localized deformation hardening in chalks generally.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. Worum and L. Michon Implications of continuous structural inversion in the West Netherlands Basin for understanding controls on Palaeogene deformation in NW Europe Journal of the Geological Society, January 1, 2005; 162(1): 73 - 85. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				How burial diagenesis of chalk sediments controls sonic velocity and porosity AAPG Bulletin, November 1, 2003; 87(11): 1755 - 1778.

				C. Hibsch, J. Cartwright, D.M. Hansen, P. Gaviglio, G. Andre, M. Cushing, P. Bracq, P. Juignet, P. Benoit, and J. Allouc Normal faulting in chalk: tectonic stresses vs. compaction-related polygonal faulting Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2003; 216(1): 291 - 308. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. P. Bloomfield, L. J. Brewerton, and D. J. Allen Regional trends in matrix porosity and dry density of the Chalk of England Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, November 1, 1995; 28(Supplement_2): S131 - S142. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. S. Ameen Fracture characterization in the Chalk and the evolution of the Thanet monocline, Kent, southern England Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 1995; 92(1): 149 - 174. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. M. Goodwin Spatial change in joint geometry in the Chalk of eastern England Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 1995; 92(1): 197 - 213. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. B. Laurie, R. H. S. Robertson, and M. A. Vicente The restoration of buildings constructed with Menorcan limestone Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, August 1, 1986; 19(3): 283 - 289. [Abstract] [PDF]