Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
  Journal of the Geological Society   Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of the Geological Society; October 1985; v. 142; no. 5; p. 757-764; DOI: 10.1144/gsjgs.142.5.0757
© 1985 Geological Society of London
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Buck, S. G.
Right arrow Articles by Minter, W. E. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Placer formation by fluvial degradation of an alluvial fan sequence: the Proterozoic Carbon Leader placer, Witwatersrand Supergroup, South Africa

S. G. Buck and W. E. L. Minter*

Geology Department, Anglo American Corporation S.A. Ltd, P.O. Box 20, Welkom, 9460, South Africa. Present addresses: Core Laboratories (UK) Limited, 75 Greenfield Road, London, UK
* Department of Geology, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, 7700, South Africa

The Carbon Leader placer is one of a sequence of placers formed in the Carletonville goldfield, South Africa, in response to periodic fluvial degradation of a series of alluvial (fluvial) fans spreading southward into the Witwatersrand Basin. The Carbon Leader placer consists of broad, interconnecting, low-sinuosity ribbon bodies of conglomeratic and arenaceous sediments, which occur in two palaeodrainage systems, initially centred some 12 km apart. Ribbon bodies range to 500 m in width and 2 m in thickness, and accumulated from extensive migration of belts of small braided streams. Lithofacies and placer mineral distributions imply that fluvial current velocities were generally greater in the central parts of the palaeodrainage systems, decreasing towards the margins.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
South African Journal of GeologyHome page
P. Eriksson, D. Long, A. Bumby, K. Eriksson, E. Simpson, O. Catuneanu, M. Claassen, M. Mtimkulu, K. Mudziri, J. Brumer, et al.
Palaeohydrological data from the c. 2.0 to 1.8 Ga Waterberg Group, South Africa: discussion of a possibly unique Palaeoproterozoic fluvial style
South African Journal of Geology, September 1, 2008; 111(2-3): 281 - 304.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society of America MemoirsHome page
W. E. L. Minter
The sedimentary setting of Witwatersrand placer mineral deposits in an Archean atmosphere
Geological Society of America Memoirs, January 1, 2006; 198(0): 105 - 119.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Economic GeologyHome page
J. P. Burton, J. P. Burton, and P. Fralick
Depositional Placer Accumulations in Coarse-Grained Alluvial Braided River Systems
Economic Geology, August 1, 2003; 98(5): 985 - 1001.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the Geological SocietyHome page
D. G. Sutherland
Geomorphological controls on the distribution of placer deposits
Journal of the Geological Society, October 1, 1985; 142(5): 727 - 737.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the Geological SocietyHome page
J. L. Best and A. C. Brayshaw
Flow separation--a physical process for the concentration of heavy minerals within alluvial channels
Journal of the Geological Society, October 1, 1985; 142(5): 747 - 755.
[Abstract] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of London