Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
  Journal of the Geological Society   Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of the Geological Society; October 1985; v. 142; no. 5; p. 837-848; DOI: 10.1144/gsjgs.142.5.0837
© 1985 Geological Society of London
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reid, lan.
Right arrow Articles by Frostick, L. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Beach orientation, bar morphology and the concentration of metalliferous placer deposits: a case study, Lake Turkana, N Kenya

lan. Reid and Lynne E. Frostick

Departments of Geography and Geology, Birkbeck College, University of London, Malet Street, London WClE 7HX, UK

The concentration of metalliferous particles in migrating swash bars is shown to depend upon processes controlled by the cross-sectional shape of the bar. A sand-spit provides two shorelines, each with a different pattern of wind-waves and each characterized consistently by bars of different shape. Where the wave period is low the bar is dune-like and its crest is set asymmetrically landward of the centre line. Where the wave period is high the bar is tabular, with a crest set just at the swash limit and on the lakeward side of the centre line. These differences in shape are important to the concentrating process. It is shown that swash-dominated dune-like forms produce concentrations of metalliferous grains that average only 13%. The tabular bar form, on the other hand, effects a significantly higher concentration of 21% through a hydrodynamic sorting process that is governed by limited swash overspill onto the landward slope. Concentrations of 90% are reached at specific positions. Confirmation of the concentrating process is obtained from detailed microstratigraphic interpretation of the contemporary bar, while the ancient bars of abandoned shorelines add supporting evidence. Clear-cut differences in placer concentration allow several diagnostic parameters to be identified for reconnaissance exploration. These include shore-line orientation, wave pattern, and bar cross-sectional morphology which can be combined with the reconstruction of abandoned shorelines using remote sensing imagery to provide a resource evaluation.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of the Geological SocietyHome page
L. FROSTICK, I. REID, J. JARVIS, and H. EARDLEY
Triassic sediments of the Inner Moray Firth, Scotland: early rift deposits
Journal of the Geological Society, April 1, 1988; 145(2): 235 - 248.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
L. E. Frostick and I. Reid
Tectonic control of desert sediments in rift basins ancient and modern
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 1987; 35(1): 53 - 68.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
L. E. Frostick and I. Reid
Evolution and sedimentary character of lake deltas fed by ephemeral rivers in the Turkana basin, northern Kenya
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 1986; 25(1): 113 - 125.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the Geological SocietyHome page
I. a. n. Reid and L. E. Frostick
Role of settling, entrainment and dispersive equivalence and of interstice trapping in placer formation
Journal of the Geological Society, October 1, 1985; 142(5): 739 - 746.
[Abstract] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of London