Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
  Journal of the Geological Society   Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of the Geological Society; March 1986; v. 143; no. 2; p. 325-326; DOI: 10.1144/gsjgs.143.2.0323
© 1986 Geological Society of London
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HANCOCK, P. L.
Right arrow Articles by WILLIAMS, G. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Article

Neotectonics

P. L. HANCOCK and G. D. WILLIAMS

The study of neotectonics is carried out by workers from a wide variety of disciplines, including structural geology seismology, regional geophysics, geomorphology and engineering geology. Landsat MSS imagery is a particularly effective tool for the investigation of neotectonic structures. The aim of the meeting was to bring together workers from the various contributory disciplines in order to discuss the development of modern techniques in each subject area. These modern approaches were exemplified by descriptions of neotectonically active regions ranging from NW Europe to China.

In order to stimulate a debate on the temporal scope of neotectonics, the meeting commenced with a short discussion paper by Hancock. He argued that the selection of an arbitrary Neogene or Quaternary date to be applied globally for the beginning of the period during which neotectonic structures form is unhelpful. He proposed as an alternative the notion that for a given region the neotectonic phase might be regarded as having begun when the present-day configuration of relevant plate boundaries and motions was established.

Blenkinsop suggested modifying Hancock’s proposal by defining the neotectonic phase as having commenced when the contemporary stress field of a region was established. Blenkinsop’s proposal possesses the great practical merit of permitting the geologist to compare regionally significant directions of horizontal compression and extension inferred from structures, known from field evidence to have been active during an appropriate time frame, with those determined from in situ measurements or fault plane solutions.

Recent earth movements give rise to geomorphological features indicative of the

...

This 250-word extract was created in the absence of an abstract.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of London