|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| Journal of the Geological Society |
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Article |
Hydrogeology Research Group, British Geological Survey, Crowmarsh Gifford, Wallingford, Oxon OXl08BB
The sensitivity of rocks and soils to acidification is best described by their acid-base titration curves. These curves tend to be relatively featureless but can be usefully summarized in terms of their initial pH, the buffer capacity at this pH, and the total acidity to pH 8.3. Unfortunately, the shapes of soil titration curves depend on the type and concentration of background electrolyte and the rate of titration. Therefore, while a set of standard titration conditions can be defined, the resulting titration curves will not simulate those applicable to in situ field conditions (as required for modelling purposes). To progress, it is necessary to gain a better understanding of the sources of, and sinks for, acidity in rocks and soils. For soils, partitioning of the acidity into soil solution, neutral salt extractable, and solid phase (but not neutral salt extractable) components provides a promising approach. This is demonstrated using a series of soil samples derived from an extremely acid humus-iron podzol overlying Eocene sand near Wokingham, Berks.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J.W.N. Smith and D.N. Lerner A framework for rapidly assessing the pollutant retardation capacity of aquifers and sediments Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, May 1, 2007; 40(2): 137 - 146. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. M. EDMUNDS and D. G. KINNIBURGH The susceptibility of UK groundwaters to acidic deposition Journal of the Geological Society, July 1, 1986; 143(4): 707 - 720. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |