Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
  Journal of the Geological Society   Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of the Geological Society; July 1986; v. 143; no. 4; p. 723-728; DOI: 10.1144/gsjgs.143.4.0723
© 1986 Geological Society of London
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Article

Discussion on the Caledonian metamorphic core: an Alpine model

DR. P. A. R. NELL writes: Bradbury (1985) presented a brave attempt at a crustal-scale model of the Dalradian. New work in the critical area of Glen Lyon (Nell 1984) suggests that Dr Bradbury’s model of Dalradian structure needs revision. The concept of a Knapdale–Tummel downbend as an ‘antithetic rootless rotation zone’ is fundamental to Bradbury’s interpretation (e.g. Bradbury 1979a, Bradbury 1985; Bradbury et al. 1979); however, the evidence from Glen Lyon shows that this structure is not of regional importance. The Tay Nappe, Bradbury et al. 1979 proposed, was extruded by Dl–D3 pure shear in the Tummel steep belt accommodated by northwesterly-directed movement on the Boundary and Killiecrankie Slides, with rolling round the Tummel downbend. The major problems with this interpretation are:

1. The Boundary Slide cuts across folds associated with the early Tay Nappe. The D2 fold equivalent to the Ben Lui fold in Glen Lyon (the ‘net F2 antiform’, Fig. 1) folds a stack of F1 folds. These folds face southwards into the ‘flat belt’ of the Tay Nappe on the upper, gently dipping limb of the D2 antiform, but face upwards to the north-west on the lower limb. As the Boundary Slide is not folded along with these F1 folds but remains parallel to the S2 cleavage, and is folded by later folds, movement on the slide in the central Highlands is confined to D2 ‘times’. It is clear that on a larger scale, from Dalmally to Schichallion, and at Braemar, the Boundary Slide continues as an integral

...

This 250-word extract was created in the absence of an abstract.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological MagazineHome page
G. I. Alsop, G. I. ALSOP, R. BRYSON, and D. H. W. HUTTON
Tectonic and kinematic evolution within mid-crustal orogenic root zones: a case study from the Caledonides of northwestern Ireland
Geological Magazine, March 1, 2001; 138(2): 193 - 211.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the Geological SocietyHome page
P. T. S. ROSE and A. L. HARRIS
Evidence for the Lower Palaeozoic age of the Tay Nappe: the timing and nature of Grampian events in the Scottish Highland sector of the Laurentian Margin
Journal of the Geological Society, March 1, 2000; 157(2): 381 - 391.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the Geological SocietyHome page
Discussion on a Pre-D2 age for the Ben Vuirich Granite
Journal of the Geological Society, December 1, 1994; 151(6): 1045 - 1048.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the Geological SocietyHome page
R. ANDERTON
Dalradian slides and basin development: a radical interpretation of stratigraphy and structure in the SW and Central Highlands of Scotland
Journal of the Geological Society, August 1, 1988; 145(4): 669 - 678.
[Abstract] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of London