|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| Journal of the Geological Society | ![]() |
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Article |
1 Regional Geophysics Research Group, British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG, UK
2 Department of Earth Sciences, Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, UK
3 Department of Geophysics, Imperial College of Science and Technology, London SW7, UK
New heat flow data for the United Kingdom, together with additional heat flow and heat production determinations for Caledonian-age granites, have led to a revision of the UK heat flow map and a re-examination of the relationship between heat flow (q0) and heat production (A0) for granites and basement rocks. Previously recognized broad belts of above-average heat flow are now resolved into separate zones which reflect, to a greater extent, the geological structure and tectonic history of the UK. The zones of highest heat flow are spatially associated with voluminous, high heat production granitoid batholiths in SW England, northern England and the Eastern Highlands of Scotland. A single linear correlation between q0 and A0 is no longer tenable and an analysis in terms of broad heat flow provinces, each with a characteristic upper-crustal heat production distribution and deep heat flow contribution, is also considered to be an oversimplification. On the q0A0 plot, the data form four separate clusters; three corresponding to the granite batholiths in SW England, northern England and the Eastern Highlands of Scotland, and the fourth to the basement rocks of central England and Wales. An explanation of the q0A0 data is proposed in terms of the crustal structure and thermo-tectonic setting of each area. In the case of the granite batholiths the data reflect the contrasting depth extent and radioelement-depth functions of the intrusions. These parameters in turn are related to the magmatic evolution and emplacement history of each batholith and the nature of the crust into which they were emplaced.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Busby, M. Lewis, H. Reeves, and R. Lawley Initial geological considerations before installing ground source heat pump systems Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, August 1, 2009; 42(3): 295 - 306. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
null Qiu Nansheng and Q. NANSHENG Geothermal regime in the Qaidam basin, northeast Qinghai-Tibet Plateau Geological Magazine, November 1, 2003; 140(6): 707 - 719. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Barker, J. A. Barker, R. A. Downing, D. A. Gray, J. Findlay, G. A. Kellaway, R. H. Parker, and K. E. Rollin Hydrogeothermal studies in the United Kingdom Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, February 1, 2000; 33(1): 41 - 58. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Cameron and T. Ziegler Probing the lower limits of a fairway: further pre-Permian potential in the southern North Sea Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 1997; 123(1): 123 - 141. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Discussion on thermal and tectonic history of the East Midlands shelf (onshore UK) and surrounding regions assessed by apatite fission track analysis Journal of the Geological Society, August 1, 1991; 148(4): 785 - 787. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| JOURNAL HOME | HELP | CONTACT PUBLISHER | SUBSCRIBE | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |