Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

Journal of the Geological Society

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by KOSTERS, E. C. Articles by BAILEY, A. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Sedimentary and botanical factors influencing peat accumulation in the Mississippi Delta

¹ Louisiana Geological Survey, Coastal Geology Program, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA. Present address: Bureau of Economic Geology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78713, USA
² Laboratory for Wetland Soils and Sediments, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA
³ Department of Geology, University of Southwestern Louisiana, Lafayette, LA 70504, USA

The Holocene Mississippi Delta System consists of six cyclic deltaic packages. Associated peat deposits are planar and eutrophic, and accumulate in areas abandoned by deltaic sedimentation. Peats that formed in large-scale interlobe basins are the subject of this paper. True peats (>75% organic matter) average 81.7% organic matter on a dry-weight basis. Controls on quality and lateral distribution of peat deposits are: botanical parent material, the balance between subsidence and accretion rates, detrital clastic influx and marine inundation. Botanical parent material, inferred from ¹³C signatures and microtome sections, is always freshwater, originating either in forested swamps, or under herbaceous (floating) mats. Sphagnum spp. is essentially absent.

In order for peat to accumulate, rates of accretion and subsidence must balance. Long-term subsidence rates in the study area increase from about 0.10 to 0.30 cm a^-1 over a distance of 40 km from upper to lower delta plain. Subsurface accretion rates for true peats at a depth of 2-3 m, however, average about 0.05 cm a^-1. Renewed coarse detrital clastic influx terminates peat accumulation. The largest quantities of true peat are found together with relatively large amounts of organic-poor clastic sediments (mostly clays).

Delta lobe abandonment and consequent coastal erosion causes salt water intrusion into freshwater environments. Resulting saline marsh sediments have maximum organic matter contents of 35%. In a transgressive setting, these may overlie older high-quality (low-ash) freshwater peats. Leaching experiments reveal the presence of water-soluble salts in both transgressed and fresh peats. Leaching reduces ash values by 1/5 to 1/3, suggesting that such losses may occur during early diagenesis. It is possible that some commercial coal seams originated in analogous interlobe environments, where leaching and possibly silica mobilization reduced the originally high ash contents to acceptable levels.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. H. Calder, M. R. Gibling, A. C. Scott, S. J. Davies, and B. L. Hebert A fossil lycopsid forest succession in the classic Joggins section of Nova Scotia: Paleoecology of a disturbance-prone Pennsylvanian wetland Geological Society of America Special Papers, January 1, 2006; 399(0): 169 - 195. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. C. Scott The legacy of Charles Lyell: advances in our knowledge of coal and coal-bearing strata Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 1998; 143(1): 243 - 260. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Discussion on the sedimentary and botanical factors influencing peat accumulation in the Mississippi Delta Journal of the Geological Society, October 1, 1989; 146(5): 877 - 880. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. S. Haszeldine Coal reviewed: depositional controls, modern analogues and ancient climates Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 1989; 41(1): 289 - 308. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. C. Scott Deltaic coals: an ecological and palaeobotanical perspective Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 1989; 41(1): 309 - 316. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. J. Stanley and D. J. STANLEY Subsidence in the Northeastern Nile Delta: Rapid Rates, Possible Causes, and Consequences Science, April 22, 1988; 240(4851): 497 - 500. [Abstract] [PDF]