Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
  Journal of the Geological Society   Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of the Geological Society; February 1988; v. 145; no. 1; p. 181-184; DOI: 10.1144/gsjgs.145.1.0181
© 1988 Geological Society of London
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Article

Discussion on the magnetic mapping of the Butterton Dyke: an example of detailed geophysical surveying

F. W. Cope and C. S. Exley write: Sowerbutts is to be congratulated on the summary of his magnetic survey of the Butterton Dyke in North Staffordshire. It is a neat demonstration of the use of a magnetic gradiometer coupled with a microcomputer-based data-gathering system in a seemingly simple geological setting.

In his introductory remarks on exposures and the likely course of the dyke, Sowerbutts states "Magnetic surveys suggest the dyke is present at Keele University, 5 km NNW of the [Church Wood] quarry". In point of fact, the dyke was well exposed within the University grounds in 1966 when an excavation was being made for a bacterial sewage tank. A photographic record was made, the petrography of the dolerite was described in detail, and the course of the dyke was plotted not only northwards from the spot where it was observed by Charles Darwin to the University outcrop, but southwards from Church Wood where twin intrusions are well exposed, over the ground covered by Sowerbutts’ magnetic survey; this 1 km length of outcrop was determined by boring with a post-auger (Cope 1966).

Sowerbutts uses a radiometric age for the dolerite of 52. ± 2 Ma (Evans 1969) which agrees with a previously determined age of 52.4 ± 1.4 Ma supplied by J. A. Miller (Cope 1966). It seems likely that both figures were based on the same assay, and they give an early Tertiary age for the intrusion.

Sowerbutts does not seem to have been aware of an exposure of the dyke which was visible in 1961 during the construction of the M6 motorway, or same or a closely related intrusion in a borehole to the north

...

This 250-word extract was created in the absence of an abstract.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological SocietyHome page
D. B. Thompson and J. A. Winchester
Field relationships, geochemistry, and tectonic context of the Tertiary dyke suites in Staffordshire and Shropshire, central England
Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society, June 1, 1995; 50(3): 191 - 208.
[Abstract] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of London