Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
  Journal of the Geological Society   Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of the Geological Society; April 1989; v. 146; no. 2; p. 361-363; DOI: 10.1144/gsjgs.146.2.0361
© 1989 Geological Society of London
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Article

Discussion on Triassic sediments of the Inner Moray Firth, Scotland: early rift deposits

A. M. Roberts, J. D. Price & M. E. Badley write: We have recently completed a structurally-based evaluation of the Inner Moray Firth basin, shortly to be submitted for publication, and read with interest the account of Frostick et al. (1988) describing its Triassic history. While we have no grounds on which to question their detailed sedimentological interpretation, we would challenge the way they have used sedimentological, seismic and other data to conclude that, during the Triassic, the entire Inner Moray Firth basin was a single ‘simple half-graben’, bounded to the NW by the ‘dip-slip’ Great Glen Fault. Of the points which could be raised in discussion we believe the following are the most pertinent.

(1) Much of their half-graben interpretation is summarized in fig. 2, which shows successive restoration to a late Triassic configuration. Disregarding the interpreted ‘detachment’ seen on their present-day section, which is not shown on the other sections, we would question two aspects of their interpretation.

(a) The Great Glen Fault is illustrated as an east-dipping, listric fault. This contradicts the evidence of all seismic data across this structure (cf. McQuillin et al. 1982, fig. 4) which show it to comprise two near-vertical fault strands. It is the very nature of this vertical, strike-slip boundary which distinguishes the western margin of the Inner Moray Firth basin from the western margin of the Viking and Central Graben.

(b) Frostick et al.’s end-Triassic reconstruction shows the ‘top-Trias marker’ defining a roll-over into the Great Glen Fault. As they

...

This 250-word extract was created in the absence of an abstract.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
H. E. Edwards, A. D. Becker, and J. A. Howell
Compartmentalization of an aeolian sandstone by structural heterogeneities: Permo-Triassic Hopeman Sandstone, Moray Firth, Scotland
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 1993; 73(1): 339 - 365.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the Geological SocietyHome page
L. E. FROSTICK, T. K. LINSEY, and I. REID
Tectonic and climatic control of Triassic sedimentation in the Beryl Basin, northern North Sea
Journal of the Geological Society, February 1, 1992; 149(1): 13 - 26.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the Geological SocietyHome page
A. M. ROBERTS, M. E. BADLEY, J. D. PRICE, and I. W. HUCK
The structural history of a transtensional basin: Inner Moray Firth, NE Scotland
Journal of the Geological Society, February 1, 1990; 147(1): 87 - 103.
[Abstract] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of London