Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

Journal of the Geological Society

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by CHADWICK, R. A. Articles by SMITH, N. J. P. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Lower crustal heterogeneity beneath Britain from deep seismic reflection data

Deep Geology Research Group, British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG, UK
¹Hydrocarbons Research Programme, British Geological Survey, Grange Terrace, Edinburgh EH9 3LA, UK

450 km of deep seismic reflection data have been acquired over the UK landmass. A qualitative assessment of lower crustal reflectivity (based on the amplitude and continuity of deep crustal events) has been made. In the cratonic area of central England the lower crust is generally poorly reflective, while in the foldbelt terrains of southern, eastern and northern England it is more strongly reflective. Beneath the Variscides of southern England an important distinction can be made between poorly reflective ‘foreland-type’ lower crust lying beneath the Variscan Front thrust and strongly reflective ‘orogenic’ lower crust farther south. A brief review is given of hypotheses for the origin of lower crustal reflectivity, and the relationship of the latter to crustal tectonic regime, both in the UK and elsewhere. It is concluded that the types of lower crustal heterogeneity required to produce the observed reflections are more easily generated in orogenic provinces (fold/thrust/metamorphic belts) than in areas which have undergone only low to moderate crustal extension (beneath typical sedimentary basins). The generation of granites by partial melting within the lower crust, and processes of metamorphic differentiation and recrystallization which accompany orogenic activity, are likely to play a significant role in the development of such heterogeneities. In addition, post-orogenic processes of magmatic underplating and low-viscosity ordering may also have played a part.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Y. Battiau-Queney Crustal anisotropy and differential uplift: their role in long-term landform development Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 1999; 162(1): 65 - 74. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. ATES and P. KEAREY Deep structure of the East Mendip Hills from gravity, aeromagnetic and seismic reflection data Journal of the Geological Society, December 1, 1993; 150(6): 1055 - 1063. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. L. KLEMPERER, P. D. RYAN, and D. B. SNYDER A deep seismic reflection transect across the Irish Caledonides Journal of the Geological Society, February 1, 1991; 148(1): 149 - 164. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. J. BLUNDELL Seismic images of continental lithosphere: President's anniversary address 1989 Journal of the Geological Society, December 1, 1990; 147(6): 895 - 913. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. K. LEE, T. C. PHARAOH, and N. J. SOPER Structural trends in central Britain from images of gravity and aeromagnetic fields Journal of the Geological Society, April 1, 1990; 147(2): 241 - 258. [Abstract] [PDF]