Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
  Journal of the Geological Society   Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of the Geological Society; December 1989; v. 146; no. 6; p. 891-892; DOI: 10.1144/gsjgs.146.6.0891
© 1989 Geological Society of London
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by FRY, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Article

Short Paper: Kinematics of the Alpine arc

NORMAN FRY

Department of Geology, UWCC, PO Box 914, Cardiff CF1 3YE, UK

Is there a continuous sweep in direction of Alpine orogenic displacements around the Alpine arc, or does the overlap of a few distinct directions give this impression? The thrust evolution of the SW Alps, which supports the latter view, does not accord with the hypothesis of indenter-induced body forces. Two displacement realms, one with directions determined by intraplate configuration and another with directions related simply to the body forces, maycoexist within the orogen, but this is not yet established.

One of the longest-standing disagreements in Alpine geology concerns the nature of the radial pattern of orogenic displacements outwards from the Alpine arc. In one view, there is a continuum of displacement directions sweeping from approximately southward in the Maritime Alps, through west and northwest to approximately northward in Austria. In the other view, there is no continuum, but a small number of distinct directions of orogenic displacements, each dominating a particular sector, which relay one to another around the Alpine arc. Recent papers mark a significant development in both sides of this argument, which is given additional importance by the attempt of Platt et al. (1989a) to use displacement data to constrain plate motions. This paper is intended as a contribution to the discussion and suggests one possible resolution of the argument.

Sophisticated syntheses of Alpine structure have for a long time accepted the possibility that both of the above views have some validity, and Goguel (1963) is a good starting point for discussion. His displacements of crystalline basement of

...

This 250-word extract was created in the absence of an abstract.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological Society of America BulletinHome page
W.H. Lickorish, M. Ford, J. Burgisser, and P.R. Cobbold
Arcuate thrust systems in sandbox experiments: A comparison to the external arcs of the Western Alps
Geological Society of America Bulletin, September 1, 2002; 114(9): 1089 - 1107.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the Geological SocietyHome page
Discussion on kinematics of the Alpine arc
Journal of the Geological Society, June 1, 1990; 147(3): 572 - 575.
[Abstract] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of London