Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
  Journal of the Geological Society   Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of the Geological Society; August 1990; v. 147; no. 4; p. 729-731; DOI: 10.1144/gsjgs.147.4.0729
© 1990 Geological Society of London
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Article

Discussion on Dalradian slides and basin development: a radical reinterpretation of stratigraphy and structure in the SW and Central Highlands of Scotland

J. L. Roberts and J. E. Treagus write:Anderton (1988) has recently proposed in this Journal a radical revision of Dalradian structure and tectonics. This is based on his view that many of the slide-zones previously identified as structural features are in fact listric growth-faults and disconformities, dating back to when the Dalradian sequence was itself deposited. There can be little doubt that some formation contacts can be interpreted in this way, particularly where they affect the little-deformed Dalradian rocks lying to the northwest of the Loch Awe Syncline. However, Anderton (1988) extends this model so that it also applies to the whole of the Dalradian outcrop from Ballachulish to Schiehallion. This has resulted in a highly simplistic model of the structural complexity shown by these intensely deformed rocks, as Anderton himself admits may well be the case (1988, p. 677). In attempting this revision, Anderton has ignored virtually all the published evidence concerning the structural relationships seen in these rocks, while he has produced no new evidence to support his own views.

The main elements in Anderton's (1988) reinterpretation are twofold, as far as they relate to the Dalradian rocks lying immediately above what we have termed the Boundary Slide (Roberts & Treagus 1979). First, Anderton (1988, p. 676) considers all these rocks to be autochthonous; and second, the synformal plunge-depressions of Ballachulish and Schiehallion areas correspond to half-graben basins, generated by syn-depositional movements on listric growth-faults, which are now represented by the Fort William and Dalradian Boundary Slides,

...

This 250-word extract was created in the absence of an abstract.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of London