Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

Journal of the Geological Society

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (19) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Meert, J.G. Articles by Lieberman, B.S. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

A palaeomagnetic and palaeobiogeographical perspective on latest Neoproterozoic and early Cambrian tectonic events

^{1 1}Department of Geological Science, University of Florida, 241 Williamson Hall, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA (e-mail: jmeert@geology.ufl.edu)
^{2 2}Department of Geology and Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas, 120 Lindley Hall, 1475 Jayhawk Blvd., Lawrence, KS 66045, USA

During the latest Neoproterozoic to Mid-Cambrian time (580–505 Ma ago), the Earth underwent significant changes in palaeogeography that included rifting of a possible supercontinent and the near simultaneous formation of a second, slightly smaller supercontinent. It is against this tectonic backdrop that the Cambrian radiation occurred. Although the general tectonic setting during this interval is fairly well constrained, models of the exact palaeogeography are controversial because of the lack of reliable palaeomagnetic data from some of the continental blocks. Palaeogeographical models based on palaeomagnetic data range from a high-latitude configuration for most continents, to a low-latitude configuration for most continents, or to rapid oscillations in continental configurations triggered by inertial changes within the planet. Palaeobiogeographical data can also be used to help constrain palaeogeographical models. To this end we use vicariance patterns in olenellid trilobites to determine their compatibility with three end-member palaeogeographical models derived from palaeomagnetic data for the Neoproterozoic and early Cambrian. The most congruent palaeogeographical model with respect to the palaeobiogeographical data described herein is the high-latitude configuration for most continents. Those palaeomagnetic models that predict inertial interchange true polar wander or multiple episodes of true polar wander differ significantly from the results from palaeobiogeography. The low-latitude palaeogeographical models also differ from the results from palaeobiogeography, but this may partly arise because of a lack of palaeomagnetic and palaeobiogeographical data from many parts of present-day South America and Africa.

KEYWORDS: Cambrian, Neoproterozoic, polar wandering, biogeography, trilobites

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. RIPPINGTON, D. CUNNINGHAM, and R. ENGLAND Structure and petrology of the Altan Uul Ophiolite: new evidence for a Late Carboniferous suture in the Gobi Altai, southern Mongolia Journal of the Geological Society, May 1, 2008; 165(3): 711 - 723. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S.A. Elming, S.N. Kravchenko, P. Layer, O.M. Rusakov, A.M. Glevasskaya, N.P. Mikhailova, and V. Bachtadse Palaeomagnetism and 40Ar/39Ar age determinations of the Ediacaran traps from the southwestern margin of the East European Craton, Ukraine: relevance to the Rodinia break-up Journal of the Geological Society, September 1, 2007; 164(5): 969 - 982. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Kroner, B.F. Windley, G. Badarch, O. Tomurtogoo, E. Hegner, B.M. Jahn, S. Gruschka, E.V. Khain, A. Demoux, and M.T.D. Wingate Accretionary growth and crust formation in the Central Asian Orogenic Belt and comparison with the Arabian-Nubian shield Geological Society of America Memoirs, January 1, 2007; 200(0): 181 - 209. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. F. Windley, D. Alexeiev, W. Xiao, A. Kroner, and G. Badarch Tectonic models for accretion of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt Journal of the Geological Society, January 1, 2007; 164(1): 31 - 47. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]