Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

Journal of the Geological Society

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (17) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Japsen, P. Articles by Chalmers, J. A. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Separation of Palaeogene and Neogene uplift on Nuussuaq, West Greenland

^{1 1}Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland (GEUS), Øster Voldgade 10, DK-1350 Copenhagen K, Denmark (e-mail: pj@geus.dk)
^{2 2}Geotrack International, 37 Melville Road, West Brunswick, Vic. 3055, Australia

The geological record exposed on Nuussuaq, central West Greenland, shows that uplift in the Palaeocene, probably caused by impact of the Iceland plume head, was followed by kilometre-scale subsidence. Analysis of apatite fission-track and vitrinite-reflectance data from borehole samples down to 3 km depth reveals that the samples cooled from maximum palaeotemperatures between 40 and 30 Ma followed by two further cooling episodes beginning in the intervals 11–10 and 7–2 Ma. When the first cooling episode began, the samples from the neighbouring Gro-3 and Gane-1 boreholes were buried 1500–2000 m deeper than at the present day, and the palaeogeothermal gradient was 40–48 °C km^–1. It is not clear whether this cooling involved exhumation or if it was due solely to reduction in heat flow and a drop in surface temperature. The two later episodes definitely involved exhumation because by then the palaeogeothermal gradient had declined to a value close to the assumed present value of 30 °C km^–1, which agrees with estimates from offshore wells. The most recent cooling episode corresponds to the incision of the present-day relief (c. 1100 m) below the summits around the two boreholes. We conclude that the present-day high mountains of West Greenland were not uplifted during the Palaeogene, but are erosional remnants of a landmass uplifted during the Neogene.

KEYWORDS: West Greenland, Cenozoic, uplift, exhumation, fission-track dating

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. HANSEN, D. A. JERRAM, K. McCAFFREY, and S. R. PASSEY The onset of the North Atlantic Igneous Province in a rifting perspective Geological Magazine, May 1, 2009; 146(3): 309 - 325. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				U. Gregersen and T. Bidstrup Structures and hydrocarbon prospectivity in the northern Davis Strait area, offshore West Greenland Petroleum Geoscience, May 1, 2008; 14(2): 151 - 166. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Burke and Y. Gunnell The African Erosion Surface: A Continental-Scale Synthesis of Geomorphology, Tectonics, and Environmental Change over the Past 180 Million Years Geological Society of America Memoirs, January 1, 2008; 201(0): 1 - 66. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. P. Holford, P. F. Green, J. P. Turner, G. A. Williams, R. R. Hillis, D. R. Tappin, and I. R. Duddy Evidence for kilometre-scale Neogene exhumation driven by compressional deformation in the Irish Sea basin system Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2008; 306(1): 91 - 119. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. P. Holford, P. F. Green, and J. P. Turner Palaeothermal and compaction studies in the Mochras borehole (NW Wales) reveal early Cretaceous and Neogene exhumation and argue against regional Palaeogene uplift in the southern Irish Sea Journal of the Geological Society, September 1, 2005; 162(5): 829 - 840. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]