Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
  Journal of the Geological Society   Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of the Geological Society; December 2005; v. 162; no. 6; p. 1005-1012; DOI: 10.1144/0016-764904-116
© 2005 Geological Society of London
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fernàndez, M.
Right arrow Articles by Karpuz, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Original Article

Lithospheric structure of the Mid-Norwegian Margin: comparison between the Møre and Vøring margins

M. Fernàndez1, C. Ayala1, M. Torne1, J. Vergés1, M. Gómez1 and R. Karpuz2

1 1Group of Dynamics of the Lithosphere, Institute of Earth Sciences ‘Jaume Almera’, CSIC, Lluís Solé i Sabarís s/n, 08028 Barcelona, Spain (e-mail: mfernandez@ija.csic.es)
2 2Norsk Hydro Oil and Gas, Bokharest Bld., Bokharest Street, 15137 Tehran, Iran

The lithospheric structure across the Møre Margin has been studied by integrating regional elevation, gravity, geoid and heat-flow data together with available seismic and geological data. Our results show that the Moho depth varies from 42 km beneath the Caledonides to 20–15 km beneath the basin and to 13–16 km in the oceanic domain. The lithosphere thins in a step-like manner from 160 km inland to 60–80 km in the oceanic domain. A comparison with the Vøring Margin reveals that both margins have similar crustal and lithospheric structures. Major dissimilarities are: (1) the volume of underplating beneath the ocean–continent boundary; (2) the lithospheric thickness beneath the Caledonian Front; (3) the lithospheric thickness beneath the distal parts of the margins. The heat transfer across the Vøring Transform Margin, the secular variation of lithospheric thickness with age, and the jump of the Aegir spreading ridge are responsible for these differences.

KEYWORDS: Møre margin, Vøring margin, Caledonides, lithosphere







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of London