Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
  Journal of the Geological Society   Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of the Geological Society; January 2006; v. 163; no. 1; p. 185-204; DOI: 10.1144/0016-764904-165
© 2006 Geological Society of London
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (21)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brown, F. H.
Right arrow Articles by McDougall, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Original Article

Sequence of tuffs between the KBS Tuff and the Chari Tuff in the Turkana Basin, Kenya and Ethiopia

Francis H. Brown1, Bereket Haileab2 and Ian McDougall3

1 Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0112, USA (e-mail: fbrown@mines.utah.edu)
2 Department of Geology, Carleton College, Northfield, MN 55057, USA
3 Research School of Earth Sciences, The Australian National University, Canberra, A.C.T. 0200, Australia

This paper describes a sequence of tuffs between the KBS and the Chari Tuff of Omo Group formations in Kenya and Ethiopia. These tuffs have recently been shown to be 1.87 ± 0.02 Ma and 1.38 ± 0.03 Ma in age, respectively. The sequence of tuffs that is derived is consistent with 40Ar/39Ar ages reported separately, and provides the stratigraphic framework for interpreting those ages. Further, new correlations are established to the Konso Formation in southern Ethiopia. As drainage from the Ethiopian Rift to the Omo–Turkana Basin developed after deposition of the Konso Formation, pumice clasts in tuffs of the Omo–Turkana Basin probably were transported there by the Omo River. The tuffs are divided into five groups on the basis of their stratigraphic position in relation to extensive ash layers. The sequence of tuffs has import for the placement and age of archaeological sites in the Koobi Fora Formation, and for ages of mammalian faunas (including hominids). Many tuffs were deposited during a 90 ka interval during which Mediterranean sapropels are lacking, suggesting that Nile flow was reduced, and that the level of a lake that occupied the Omo–Turkana Basin at the time was low. Thus the record of climatic influence on deposition in the Omo–Turkana Basin, previously shown for the Kibish Formation (≤200 ka), extends at least to early Pleistocene time.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ScienceHome page
M. R. Bennett, J. W.K. Harris, B. G. Richmond, D. R. Braun, E. Mbua, P. Kiura, D. Olago, M. Kibunjia, C. Omuombo, A. K. Behrensmeyer, et al.
Early Hominin Foot Morphology Based on 1.5-Million-Year-Old Footprints from Ileret, Kenya
Science, February 27, 2009; 323(5918): 1197 - 1201.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the Geological SocietyHome page
I. McDOUGALL and F. H. BROWN
Geochronology of the pre-KBS Tuff sequence, Omo Group, Turkana Basin
Journal of the Geological Society, March 1, 2008; 165(2): 549 - 562.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the Geological SocietyHome page
I. McDougall and F. H. Brown
Precise 40Ar/39Ar geochronology for the upper Koobi Fora Formation, Turkana Basin, northern Kenya
Journal of the Geological Society, January 1, 2006; 163(1): 205 - 220.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of London