Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
  Journal of the Geological Society   Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of the Geological Society; December 2007; v. 164; no. 6; p. 1241-1252; DOI: 10.1144/0016-76492006-178
© 2007 Geological Society of London
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jones, B.
Right arrow Articles by Owen, R.B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Original Article

The geological history of Geysir, Iceland: a tephrochronological approach to the dating of sinter

Brian Jones1, Robin W. Renaut2, Helgi Torfason3,4 and R.Bernhart Owen5

1 1Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2E3, Canada (e-mail: Brian.Jones{at}ualberta.ca)
2 2Department of Geological Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 5E2, Canada
3 3Icelandic Institute of Natural History, Hlemmur 3, IS-125, Iceland
4 4Present address: National Energy Authority, Grensásvegur 9, Reykjavík, Iceland
5 5Department of Geography, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong, China

The vertical succession through the discharge apron of Geysir, up to 3.5 m thick, is formed of five lithological units, A–E. Units A, B, C, and E are formed of siliceous sinters whereas Unit D is a brown ash bed. Tephra grains in units C, D, and E came from Katla, Hekla, and Veiðivötn. Katla tephra in Unit D has been largely altered to palagonite. Integration of tephrochronological ages, historical records, and geological and geomorphological relationships shows that the Geysir succession developed in four main phases. During Phase I, c. 10 000–4000 years ago, laminated sinters formed from hot spring waters. Phase II, initiated c. 3300 years ago, saw the termination of sinter formation and blanketing of the area with tephra from Katla and Hekla. Phase III, c. 3000–900 years ago, represented by the boundary between units D and E, was characterized by weathering and little sinter deposition. Phase IV was initiated with the (re)birth of Geysir 800–900 years ago. Sinter deposited from the discharged waters has, however, been largely confined to the southern part of the discharge apron. Only limited opal-A precipitation has occurred since 1916 because of a decline in Geysir's eruptions.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological MagazineHome page
D. M. GUIDO and K. A. CAMPBELL
Jurassic hot-spring activity in a fluvial setting at La Marciana, Patagonia, Argentina
Geological Magazine, July 1, 2009; 146(4): 617 - 622.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of London