Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
  Journal of the Geological Society   Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of the Geological Society; May 2003; v. 160; no. 3; p. 495-496; DOI: 10.1144/0016-764902-155
© 2003 Geological Society of London
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by James, D.M.D.
Right arrow Articles by Lonergan, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Discussion

Discussion on mechanisms and controls on the formation of sand intrusions

D.M.D. James, R.J.H. Jolly and L. Lonergan

Penparc, Cwmystwyth SY23 4AG, UK (e-mail: davidmd.james@ virgin.net) BP Exploration, Chertsey Road, Sunbury-on-Thames, Middlesex, TW16 7LN, UK (e-mail: jollr1@bp.com) Department of Earth Science & Engineering South Kensington Campus, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK (e-mail: l.lonergan@ic.ac.uk)

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

D. M. D. James writes: I congratulate the authors on a very clear and comprehensive account of a widespread and complex phenomenon of increasing economic importance. However, presumably for didactic ease, they have made some simplifications that I feel are counterproductive for full physical understanding.

It is not entirely clear from the paper that sand intrusions require a concatenation of source/seal properties that on the face of it are very rare. These are that the source sand bed must have a negligible grain cohesion typical of burial at very low vertical effective stress (not shallow depth, necessarily) and that the seal must have effectively negligible permeability, typical of burial at very high vertical effective stress (and often associated with high cohesion). In most basins sands that can be fluidized are interbedded with ‘leaky‘ shales of high permeability (for shales) that do not sustain high overpressure during normal compaction. However, such high overpressure is vital because the intrusion is powered by a pressure decline at source that provides the mechanical energy to strain elastically the intrusion walls and to drive the ascent of the fluidized sand against frictional resistance. This cannot happen if fracture takes place when fluid pressure reaches a value merely equal to that of the horizontal stress (as illustrated by the authors in their figs 6 and 8) as this lies on the closure gradient of any fracture, not its inception gradient. How then can the requisite overpressure for fracture initiation and propagation be attained at the shallow depths normally associated with low vertical effective stress?

Of the obvious ways around this problem, the development of zero permeability diagenetic or clathrate seals seems unlikely to be a universal solution. More likely, and not mentioned in the paper, is that the source pressure builds up at such a high . . . [Full Text of this Article]







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of London