Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

Journal of the Geological Society

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ring, U. Articles by Kleinspehn, J.H.tenVeenandK.L. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Discussion on incipient continental collision and plate-boundary curvature: Late Pliocene–Holocene transtensional Hellenic forearc, Crete, Greece

Institut für Geowissenschaften, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, 55099 Mainz, Germany Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences, Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands (e-mail: johan.ten.veen@alw.vu.nl) Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Minesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455-0219, USA

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

U. Ring & T. C. Brachert write: In their recent paper ten Veen & Kleinspehn (2003) proposed that the western Messara graben of central Crete underwent transtensional deformation since about 3.4 Ma. Transtension is supposed to be dominantly resolved along 070°-striking sinistral faults and that the 070°-striking faults have strike-slip:normal-slip ratios of 10–100:1. Ten Veen & Kleinspehn (2003) then use their results from the western Messara graben to propose that sinistral transtension should represent tectonic escape of central and eastern Crete during incipient collision of the Libyan passive margin. The interpretation of the kinematic data on which ten Veen & Kleinspehn (2003) base their tectonic model is in contrast to earlier studies, which have attributed the young, i.e. Pliocene to Recent, kinematics of Crete largely to radial extension (Angelier et al. 1982; Fassoulas 2001; Ring et al. 2001).

Ten Veen & Kleinspehn (2003, p.167) argued that ‘. . . onshore structural assemblages is critical to deciphering forearc kinematics. . .’ and therefore we present our kinematic data from onshore faults in the western and central Messara graben and compare our data together with the fault-slip data of Fassoulas (2001) from the Heraklion graben and microseismicity data (Hatzfeld et al. 1993; Delibasis et al. 1999) with the fault-slip data of ten Veen & Kleinspehn (2003, fig. 9) for discussing the kinematics of the young faults. We believe that fault-slip data directly reflect the kinematics of the faults from which they were collected and therefore allow testing the proposition often Veen & Kleinspehn that sinistral transtension is supposed to be mainly resolved at the 070°-striking faults, the latter of which are known to be an integral part of the youngest set of faults on Crete (Fassoulas 2001) and are in part . . . [Full Text of this Article]