Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
  Journal of the Geological Society   Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of the Geological Society; January 2006; v. 163; no. 1; p. 221-223; DOI: 10.1144/0016-764905-111
© 2006 Geological Society of London
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by James, D.M.D.
Right arrow Articles by Swarbrick, R.E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Discussion

Discussion on development of polygonal fault systems: a test of hypotheses

D.M.D. James1, N.R. Goulty2 and R.E. Swarbrick2

1 3 Finedon Hall, Finedon NN9 5NL, UK
2 Department of Earth Sciences, University of Durham, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

D. M. D. James writes: the mechanics of formation of polygonal faults are widely acknowledged as not yet fully understood and it is welcome that Goulty & Swarbrick (2005) attempt a discriminatory test between rival hypotheses. It is however important that such a test bears some relation to physical reality.

The ‘test’ is based on the assumption that the ratio of horizontal to vertical effective stress as deduced from leak-off tests in two wells in the North Sea at depths of about 2 km yields the co-efficient of earth pressure at rest therein and hence the residual friction governing the post-nucleation development of polygonal faults, apparently globally and at any depth. It is not clear if the authors consider that the polygonal fault tiers at the well sites are currently active. Neither is it clear if they assume that the coefficient of residual friction along the fracture is a reasonable approximation to the coefficient of initial friction which governs the dip of the propagating fracture tip (and the fault surface as a whole) relative to the orientation of the vertical effective stress.

It is hardly surprising that the ratio of horizontal to vertical effective stress (k) is very high in the wells analysed; the leak-off tests are from highly overpressured horizons (ratios of pore fluid pressure to total vertical stress approximately 0.80 and 0.84) and the effect of pore fluid pressure coupling (Hillis 2003) will inevitably decrease the value of the horizontal effective stress to lesser extent than it does the vertical effective stress. It is certainly not yet demonstrated that polygonal faults require overpressures of this magnitude for their formation, by any mechanism. Leak-off tests tend to overestimate the horizontal effective stress if no correction is made for the excess mud pressure necessary to overcome . . . [Full Text of this Article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Petroleum GeoscienceHome page
N. R. Goulty
Geomechanics of polygonal fault systems: a review
Petroleum Geoscience, November 1, 2008; 14(4): 389 - 397.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the Geological SocietyHome page
J. Cartwright
The impact of 3D seismic data on the understanding of compaction, fluid flow and diagenesis in sedimentary basins
Journal of the Geological Society, September 1, 2007; 164(5): 881 - 893.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by Geological Society of London